<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.jets.dk/cs/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Questions about the F-16</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/19/ShowForum.aspx</link><description>Questions about the F-16</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60526.2668)</generator><item><title>Re:Julian</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1387.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2001 17:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:1387</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1387.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=19&amp;PostID=1387</wfw:commentRss><description>*** Posted by jesse *** &lt;br /&gt;[&lt;br /&gt;Hi Rapier &lt;br /&gt;As you may know to design a civilian aircraft is very hard in comparision with a fighter. The safety systems, stability, comfort and other things are very hard to master.&lt;br /&gt;   Boeing 747 is a subsonic plane so that you don't study very advanced aerodinamics and the F16 is a supersonic fighter where the most importants concepts of design is advanced aerod. and other things like maneuvrability, etc...&lt;br /&gt;TIGER&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cool!  You have chosen a very interesting pair of aircraft.  The F-16, light and nimble, the boeing 747, big, cumbersome and slow.  But why not choose 2 fighters?  Are you comparing them in some ways, like the fly-by-wire system?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rapier]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;well they are talking about 1 aircraft and comparing it with 1 fighter&lt;br /&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>