<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.jets.dk/cs/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Weapons</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/16/ShowForum.aspx</link><description>Weapons questions go here.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60526.2668)</generator><item><title>Sale of Russian helicopters and spare parts Mi-8 engines all helicopters Mil</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/14275.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:30:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:14275</guid><dc:creator>Aviator.RU</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/14275.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=14275</wfw:commentRss><description>Sale of Russian helicopters and spare parts Mi-8 engines all helicopters Mil. e-mail: businessjets@bk.ru</description></item><item><title>Northrop-Loral F-19A Specter</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/8604.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:58:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:8604</guid><dc:creator>Cutaway</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/8604.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=8604</wfw:commentRss><description>I know of "F-19A" models being released to the public to confuse
communist spy rings during the 1980s, But is it possible this aircraft
or somthing like it exists?. Its becouse the design from Monogram
models is based on a design by Loral and is also more aircraft-like
than the one made by Testors. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Wherever it is real or not, I believe the "F-19A Specter" would be a
feasible design for a fighter aircraft that will offer a wide range of
capabilities, even for todays technology.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The first image below is the concept by Loral Inc:&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://lh4.ggpht.com/abramsv/R9DianH56aI/AAAAAAAALAQ/GSDxv4fBx-4/Loral-f-19.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3188/2331030387_db3968995e_o.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;div&gt;In 1972, the United States Air Force issued a Request For Proposal
(RFP) to Northrop, McDonnell-Douglas, and General Dynamics for a
supersonic stealth aircraft.&lt;br&gt;
All three companies submitted design proposals in early 1974. On 2
September 1974, it was quietly announced that Northrop would be prime
contractor of PROJECT SPECTER&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(It is interesting to note that the design submitted by General
Dynamics would later be the “cranked arrow” F-16XL that would later
compete against the F-15E in the light strike fighter/bomber
competition in 1985.)&lt;br&gt;
Northrop went to work immediately following the contract announcement.
Special Project 711 was underway. Northrop had to invent new
technologies for project 711. Engineers decided to incorporate a
Fly-by-Wire flight control system, use of carbon-fiber epoxy as the
main component of the airframe and the new Sperry APQ-118 fire control
system. Project 711 also had to make use of the new Hughes AIM-78X low
observable air-to-air/air-to-ground missile. The decision was also made
that there would be six preproduction prototype aircraft. &lt;br&gt;
To speed the design and build process, Northrop used many
“off-the-shelf” parts. The nose landing gear system was from the F-5E
Tiger II, the main landing gear came from the F-18A Hornet, in which
Northrop is sub-sub-contractor. The main landing gear wheels and came
from mothballed F-4C/D/E Phantom II’s in the Boneyard. Northrop, acting
as a foreign entity through the permission of the President of the
United States, purchased F-16A canopy assemblies for the project. The
majority of the avionics were also proven avionics systems found in
other aircraft minus specialized ECM equipment.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Design features included a wing folding mechanism that are horizontal
for take-off and landing, then can droop up to 30 degrees in flight and
then fold back on top of the wing when parked. The droop tip design
extends the cruise range by allowing the aircraft to ride its own shock
wave, hence reducing fuel consumption. The intake ramps pivot up to
fair over the intake for extended glide stealth target approach, the
breather doors for the engine compressors open when the aircraft
performing high-g maneuvers. The Rapid Rotating Weapon Pallet (RRWP)
provides a wide variety of mission profiles for all weapons.&lt;br&gt;
On August 2, 1982, Special Project 711, now officially called the F-19A
Specter, made it’s official rollout from the Northrop Black Cat
facility under extreme secrecy. Following a Northrop flight test
program, the aircraft was delivered to the Air Force on 15 December
1982. Specter One arrived at Groom Lake, Nevada under the cover of
darkness by Lt. Col. Chester “Devastator” Moore. Specter One became
part of the 440th Test Wing, 199th Test and Evaluation Squadron.
Specter crews were chosen from the top fighter and reconnaissance
pilots in the Air Force. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A total of six pre-production Engineering Manufacturing and Design
(EMD) test aircraft were delivered to the 199th in 1982 and 1983. &lt;br&gt;
Specter One was used for flight envelope testing. &lt;br&gt;
Specter Two was used for stealth and penetration testing. &lt;br&gt;
Specter Three was the armament test bed. &lt;br&gt;
Specter Four was used for ballistics tests. &lt;br&gt;
Specter Five was the dedicated pilot training aircraft.&lt;br&gt;
Specter Six, also know as “Groom’s Gal” was the first Specter to be
used in a full up exercise and had the complete suite of defensive,
offensive avionics suites installed. Complete avionic suites would be
added to all aircraft by May 1984.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Specter Six, also know as “Groom’s Gal” was the first Specter to be
used in a full up exercise and had the complete suite of defensive,
offensive avionics suites installed. Complete avionic suites would be
added to all aircraft by May 1984&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
During the Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&amp;amp;E) of the Specter in
the May 1984, the aircrafts performed flawlessly. The F-19 held a
mission capable rate of 98.7% of all sorties tasked. When word was
delivered that the F-19 met all mission requirements; the decision was
made to put the F-19 into low rate initial production (LRIP). &lt;br&gt;
An order was placed in July 1986 for 100 F-19A and 25 F-19B two-place
fighter/trainer aircraft from Northrop for the USAF. It looked as
though the Specter program had nothing but smooth sailing ahead of it.&lt;br&gt;
As with all black budget programs, no disclosure was made due to
national security, but that year, Congress had changed the rules
concerning black budget programs. Congress had demanded where and how
much money was being spent on the program. After intense pressure, then
President Ronald Reagan released all information on PROJECT SPECTER.
The cost overruns were astronomical. The F-19 was 10 million dollars
over budget. When word of this circulated around Capital Hill,
cancellation of the program was imminent.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Almost one year to the day, July 1987, Congress announced that the F-19
Specter was to be cancelled. On an interesting note, Lockheed already
had a stealth aircraft, the F-117 Nighthawk, flying at the Tonopah Test
Range, Nevada. But since both aircraft teams were sworn to secrecy,
neither knew of each other’s existence.&lt;br&gt;
The news was devastating to both Northrop and the Specter team at Groom
Lake. Due to the secret nature of the aircraft, it was decided that all
six Specter stay at Groom Lake and be disposition on site: &lt;br&gt;
Specter Two was stripped of it components and was towed to the flight
line fire pit for fire training and of last report was completely
destroyed after one fire exercise due to the carbon fiber make up of
the aircraft. &lt;br&gt;
Specter Three was used as a maintenance trainer in Composite Airframe
Battle Damage Repair (CABDR) and by 1995 there was little left of the
aircraft to be recognizable as an F-19; it was eventually hauled away
to an undisclosed location. Rumor has it that it is buried under the
Bellagio Hotel in Las Vegas. &lt;br&gt;
Specter Four was placed out on the live fire test range and was
eventually destroyed by it’s rival, the F-117A Nighthawk, aircraft
number 790, in a bombing run. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Specter Five was destroyed in a training accident in 1985 when the
primary flight control hydraulic pump failed in flight. The pilot
ejected safely. &lt;br&gt;
Specter Six was also destroyed in a training accident in 1986 when
pilot, Capt. Dirk “Squarejaw” Pottenger over stressed the airframe in a
15g turn and catastrophic airframe damage occurred. Luckily, Squarejaw
did eject safely and now in the Guinness Book of World Records as the
only human to survive a 15g ejection from an aircraft.&lt;br&gt;
Perhaps the most interesting disposition is Specter One. Specter One
remained at Groom Lake for limited flight-testing. This aircraft was
used to test a wide range of programs. Specter One holds the
distinction as being the test bed for the now famous “Hill II” paint
scheme, found on the F-4G Wild Weasel. In 1988, Specter One was turned
over to NASA for High-Speed Stealth Research (HSSR). When NASA finished
the HSSR program in 1994, it was stripped of all equipment and the USAF
released the aircraft for static display at the Pima County Air Museum
in Arizona. Specter One remained on display until 1997, when it was
discovered, that a foreign government had, in essence, copied the F-19.
The USAF took possession of the aircraft and it was towed to nearby
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. It is rumored that the aircraft stayed at
Davis-Monthan for two-years under going an extensive modification
program. In the summer of 1999, the last remaining F-19A Specter was
seen taking-off from the main runway at dusk, never to be seen again.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
EPILOGUE&lt;br&gt;
Northrop tried to regain its glory in the fighter aircraft industry in
the 1980s with the F-20 Tigershark. Even though it was flown by famous
test pilot, Charles “Chuck” Yeager and endorsed by him as the finest
jet fighter ever built, the USAF had no need for the aircraft. Since
the U.S. would not buy the aircraft, there was little hope for foreign
sales. After a series of fatal crashes, the F-20 was cancelled. But,
Northrop had an ace in the hole. &lt;br&gt;
Northrop, vowing not to be counted out as a contender in the stealth
race, won the B-2 stealth bomber contract. The B-2A has met all design
requirements and is in full production. But all was not well.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Once again the USAF released a design requirement for the Advanced
Technology Fighter (ATF) program. Competing bids by
Lockheed/Boeing/General Dynamics and Northrop/McDonnell-Douglas were
awarded and a fly-off would determine the winner. Once again Lockheed
came out on top and was awarded the ATF contract for the F-22 Raptor.
Sources state that&lt;br&gt;
Northrop’s entry, the YF-23, was clearly a superior aircraft and the
reason it as not awarded to them was that Northrop held the B-2 bomber
contract.&lt;br&gt;
As for F-19A, serial number AF81-0001, Specter One, its current
location and mission are unknown. Several sources, close to the author,
have stated seeing the F-19A during operations over Kosovo and recently
in OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM. Air Force officials do admit that Specter
One is still in service and is only used when absolutely necessary.
There is some talk as to producing ten more F-19’s with updated 21st
Century technology and carrying the F-19C designation. Only time and
budget will tell…&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description></item><item><title>A fast and unusual German</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/14018.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 11:12:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:14018</guid><dc:creator>pampa14</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/14018.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=14018</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;span id="result_box" class=""&gt;&lt;span class="hps"&gt;The&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;link&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;below provides&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;a full report&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;and pictures of&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;one of the fastest&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;aircraft&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;of&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;its class&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;,&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;but never&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;went into production&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;We are&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;talking about the&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;Heinkel&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps atn"&gt;He &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;119&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;If it had been&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;produced and&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;participated in&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;WW2&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;its&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;performance&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;would have changed&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;in some way&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;course of the war&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;?&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;What do you think?&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;Click on&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;the link below&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;and&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="hps"&gt;take your own conclusions&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://aviacaoemfloripa.blogspot.com.br/2011/03/heinkel-he-119.html&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best Regards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description></item><item><title>Chinese Stealth Fighter</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/4386.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:34:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:4386</guid><dc:creator>ChickFighterpilot</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/4386.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=4386</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;img src="/cs/emoticons/emotion-18.gif" alt="Huh?" /&gt;China has begun developing a stealth fighter aircraft, according to a defence industry report published on Wednesday.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The stealth technology planned for the plane has not been revealed but one expert suggests the aircraft will be considerably less sophisticated than the latest US stealth aircraft.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The plane is in early stages of development with engineers considering a number of different potential designs, according to the report in the &lt;I&gt;Jane's Defence Weekly&lt;/I&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Development of the fighter's engines and weapons systems has begun at the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation in northeast China, the report says, quoting an unnamed senior source at the China Aviation Industry Company. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Photographs obtained by the magazine show a model of a twin-engine aircraft comparable in design to the US F/A 22 fighter. The fighter has angular features, similar in shape to the US F-117A Nighthawk stealth bomber. This helps prevent aircraft being detected by radar.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;H5&gt;Derivative design&lt;/H5&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Craig Hoyle, editor of &lt;I&gt;Jane's Defence Weekly&lt;/I&gt;, says other features, including the vehicle's coating, can contribute to stealth. But he adds that China's military aircraft development programme has often relied on adapting proven technology. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;He also notes that the Russian military claims to have developed technology that can detect stealth aircraft. "If they are building something based on a technology the US developed 20 years ago, there may already be something out there that can detect it," Hoyle told &lt;B&gt;New Scientist&lt;/B&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The US is currently working on a more advanced stealth aircraft than the Nighthawk. In October 2002, Boeing revealed a bat-winged stealth jet called the Bird of Prey. This is rumoured to have advanced stealth features such as adaptive camouflage, but no details have been disclosed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dubbed the J-X, the new Chinese aircraft would extend China's fighter plane range. China has developed another fighter known as the J-10, which is comparable&lt;img src="/cs/emoticons/emotion-18.gif" alt="Huh?" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>laboratori</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/10563.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:17:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:10563</guid><dc:creator>aviogamma</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/10563.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=10563</wfw:commentRss><description>aviogamma.com wepens for sale&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Prone Pilot fighter aircraft cockpits</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/8606.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:02:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:8606</guid><dc:creator>Cutaway</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/8606.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=8606</wfw:commentRss><description>Although this is one of the early attempts to withstand g-forces, I still think it would be useful for a cheap fighter plane project but as it restricts the pilots view to some extents, it would be better suited for an Interceptor/Recon aircraft. Below is the cockpit of a Northrop XP-79.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.militaryimages.net/photopost/data/526/XP-79_Prone_Pilot_Cockpit.JPG" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1141/754691763_4371c6cecc.jpg?v=0" border="0" /&gt;</description></item><item><title>T-50 competition????</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/5656.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:29:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:5656</guid><dc:creator>Mach3</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/5656.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=5656</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;FONT size=2&gt;Does the T-50 have some competition now? &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I just heard about a new start-up aircraft company based in the US producing an advanced jet trainer as well. Its their first aircraft, but they say it can do more than the T-50 and is slotted to be $15M, making that $5-$7 million cheaper than the T-50 too. Prototype roll-out scheduled for 2014.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Anyone else heard this? You think they can make the competition to replace the T-38 and othe trainers around the world???&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It will be interesting for sure if they pull it off.&lt;/FONT&gt;</description></item><item><title>AIM-9X </title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/5521.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:02:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:5521</guid><dc:creator>typhoon1</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/5521.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=5521</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Hi There&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wonder if some one can help i am looking for pictures of RDAF F-16s carrying the new AIM-9X missile,i need the pictures to help me with a&amp;nbsp;model kit which i am about to start .The only picture i have seen is aircraft no E-611 taken at Leeuwarden.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Many Thanks&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>F16 Viper - F18 Hornet Comparision</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/972.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 1999 05:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:972</guid><dc:creator>anonymous2</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/972.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=972</wfw:commentRss><description> *** Posted by Viper *** &lt;br /&gt;Hi Rapier &lt;br /&gt;  The question is : F16 Block ??? &lt;br /&gt;  Let's say F16 Block 50-52&lt;br /&gt;  You cannot compare him with Super Hornet just because you dont know yet the flying envelope.&lt;br /&gt;  But compared with F18 hornet C version&lt;br /&gt;here's the list:&lt;br /&gt;1. Thrust to weight ratio - F16&lt;br /&gt;2. Very low speed maneuvering - F18&lt;br /&gt;3. All around visibility - F16&lt;br /&gt;4. Supersonic speeds - F16&lt;br /&gt;5. AoA - F18&lt;br /&gt;6. Energy management - F16&lt;br /&gt;7. Engine survability - F18&lt;br /&gt;8. Avionics - F18&lt;br /&gt;9. Smaller radar cross section - F16&lt;br /&gt;10. Agility - F16&lt;br /&gt;  You see? Now who's better?&lt;br /&gt;  If you have additional comp write them down.&lt;br /&gt; Thanks&lt;br /&gt;  Viper &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Colored bound on the Weapons</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/3151.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:53:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:3151</guid><dc:creator>Schmusekatze</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/3151.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=3151</wfw:commentRss><description>Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;i saw many Weapons and I was surprised at the different colors. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sometimes the bound is blue&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="http://www.ournet.md/~f16falcon/Pages/Weapons/Foto/9.jpg" href="http://www.ournet.md/~f16falcon/Pages/Weapons/Foto/9.jpg"&gt;http://www.ournet.md/~f16falcon/Pages/Weapons/Foto/9.jpg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sometimes the bound ist yellow&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="http://www.ournet.md/~f16falcon/Pages/Weapons/Foto/10.jpg" href="http://www.ournet.md/~f16falcon/Pages/Weapons/Foto/10.jpg"&gt;http://www.ournet.md/~f16falcon/Pages/Weapons/Foto/10.jpg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" title="http://www.ournet.md/~f16falcon/Pages/Weapons/Foto/10.jpgIs" href="http://www.ournet.md/~f16falcon/Pages/Weapons/Foto/10.jpgIs"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Is there a meaning for these different colors?&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for help.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Greets</description></item><item><title>Revolutionary Air-borne re-arming system</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/3736.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 19:43:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:3736</guid><dc:creator>Snapshot</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/3736.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=3736</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;DIV class=Section1&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I wormly recommend to review FAR Technologies Ltd. ("FAR") website: &lt;A href="http://www.fartechnologies.com/"&gt;http://www.fartechnologies.com/&lt;/A&gt;,&amp;nbsp;for innovative concepts and technologies in the military aviation arena, among them is the &lt;STRONG&gt;Air-Born Re-Arm&lt;/STRONG&gt; and the &lt;STRONG&gt;Steerable Gun Pod &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=Section1&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;
&lt;DIV class=Section1&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description></item><item><title>Video - Nordic Archer 06 (AMRAAM Testing) Commenced</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/3533.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 12:37:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:3533</guid><dc:creator>run</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/3533.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=3533</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;On 2 August, 2006 an AMRAAM AIM-120C-5 test missile&lt;BR&gt;was fired from a Royal Danish Air Force F-16 at the&lt;BR&gt;RFN Test Range located in Vidsel, Sweden. Preliminary&lt;BR&gt;results indicate that the missile successfully&lt;BR&gt;intercepted the MQM-107 target drone. This firing &lt;BR&gt;was part of a series of planned launches for final&lt;BR&gt;verification of missile software developed for AMRAAM&lt;BR&gt;missiles exported to international military customers.&lt;BR&gt;These launches demonstrate end-to-end function of the&lt;BR&gt;aircraft and missile software.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The RDAF F-16 piloted by KN Raahauge in a production&lt;BR&gt;aircraft from the 730 Squadron at Skrydstrup Air&lt;BR&gt;Base, Denmark. A second F-16 provided safety and photo&lt;BR&gt;chase. The Royal Danish Air Force deployed a maintenance&lt;BR&gt;team to RFN to provide ground support of the aircraft.&lt;BR&gt;Sweden RFN provided all range support for the test &lt;BR&gt;mission. The United States provided participants from&lt;BR&gt;the Air-to-Air International Support Squadron (AAISS),&lt;BR&gt;Raytheon Missile Systems Company, and Wyle Laboratories.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The AMRAAM missile is manufactured by Raytheon&lt;BR&gt;Company in Tucson, Arizona. The AMRAAM International&lt;BR&gt;Product Group, located at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida,&lt;BR&gt;manages FMS cases for procurement and support of AMRAAM&lt;BR&gt;missiles. All of the laboratory and captive flight tests&lt;BR&gt;of the FMS software were completed at U.S. locations.&lt;BR&gt;Completion of this final stage of the Live-Fire testing at&lt;BR&gt;a test range outside of the U.S. presented a unique&lt;BR&gt;opportunity to involve international customers in AMRAAM&lt;BR&gt;developmental activities. The RFN Test Range was the first&lt;BR&gt;non-U.S. site approved for conducting AMRAAM instrumented&lt;BR&gt;flight testing outside of the continental U.S.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;P class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.avitop.com/video/NordicArcher.wmv"&gt;&lt;img src="http://alexander.raahauge.com/photos/run/images/368/original.aspx" border = "0"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href = "http://www.avitop.com/video/NordicArcher.wmv"&gt;Download&lt;/a&gt; Format: wmv&lt;br /&gt;Duration: 0:50&lt;/div&gt;</description><enclosure url="http://www.avitop.com/video/NordicArcher.wmv" length="0" type="video/x-ms-wmv" /></item><item><title>SS-27 TOPOL-10,000 miles per hour</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/3374.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 19:27:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:3374</guid><dc:creator>Raghunath</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/3374.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=3374</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I wanted to know as much as possible about this new (relatively) missile called the TOPOL.It is suppossed to be the modern supermissile capable of speeds which are rumored to be as much as 10,000 mph (!!!!!).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;According to me, this is trash.....Anything flying at that speed in the stratosphere would get charred in a matter of seconds.I need more information on this missile , please!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Raghunath&lt;/P&gt;</description></item><item><title>stealth  bombers</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1093.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2000 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:1093</guid><dc:creator>anonymous2</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1093.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=1093</wfw:commentRss><description> *** Posted by spencer stevens *** &lt;br /&gt;Hi. My question is have you ever flown a stealth bomber? If so , did you like it? Stealth bombers are my favorite airplane. Hope you can answer my question.                                                                                      Spencer Stevens  age 11  I saw your site on zdtv last night. I like it!</description></item><item><title>AIM-9X</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/2855.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:19:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:2855</guid><dc:creator>CAPman21</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/2855.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=2855</wfw:commentRss><description>I was wondering if you guys had any information about the AIM-9X.&amp;nbsp; I've seen it mentioned in books but I don't have any real information about it.&amp;nbsp; I read that it is the US's response to the ASRAAM.&amp;nbsp; Is there just a bigger warhead or just a seeker head upgrade?&lt;br /&gt;Thanks</description></item><item><title>torpedo</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/2703.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 21:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:2703</guid><dc:creator>Ché</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/2703.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=2703</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #efefef"&gt;Are torpedo's still in use or are exocet and cetera used for antiship missions? &lt;br /&gt;and what is the american antishipmisile accept the harpoon?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Advantage of a semi-active radar guided missile?</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/2047.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:04:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:2047</guid><dc:creator>DragonFang</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/2047.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=2047</wfw:commentRss><description>I've only been in the forum for a few minutes but already I'm hooked.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My question concerns a possible advantage of using SARH(Semi-Active Radar Homing) missiles over active radar guided missiles.  I know that SARH missiles use the radar signals from the launching aircraft the guide themselves to the target, so the launching aircraft may be able to see through countermeasures, if you know what I mean.  However, an actively guided missile does not require the launching aircraft to maintain a lock until impact.  So if the active radar missile can get spoofed by chaff.  Then it has no way to re-attain a lock on the correct target.  But in using a SARH missile it seems that the launching aircraft's radar could give the missile a "second chance" by directing the missile back to the correct target.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I guess this is more of wondering if I'm right rather that a question, although I probably don't fully understand the behavior of a missile.  If you don't understand what I am saying then please tell me and I'll try to explain it again in English  ;)</description></item><item><title>What's better the Viper or Hornet?</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/928.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 1999 05:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:928</guid><dc:creator>anonymous2</dc:creator><slash:comments>10</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/928.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=928</wfw:commentRss><description> *** Posted by Rapier *** &lt;br /&gt;Hi,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now that the Super Hornet has hit the sky I wonder if it's better than the F-16?  What do you think guy's?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rapier</description></item><item><title>Cluster bombs.  Amazing!</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/517.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1999 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:517</guid><dc:creator>anonymous2</dc:creator><slash:comments>15</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/517.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=517</wfw:commentRss><description> *** Posted by Rapier *** &lt;br /&gt;Hi guys,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've just seen some footage of a cluster bomb causing some devistation, amazing it looks a bit like a wild firework.  Have you ever had the pleasure of blowing something to bit's RUN?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rapier</description></item><item><title>THE AIM-54 IS IT STILL THE BEST?</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1368.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:1368</guid><dc:creator>anonymous2</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1368.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=1368</wfw:commentRss><description> *** Posted by DUSTY! *** &lt;br /&gt;THE AIM-54 AND THE F-14 ARE STILL THE BEST FIRE AND FORGET PAKAGE DO YOU AGREE?</description></item><item><title>EFA, GUN?</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1528.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2001 16:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:1528</guid><dc:creator>anonymous2</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1528.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=1528</wfw:commentRss><description> *** Posted by DUSTY *** &lt;br /&gt;CAN ANY ONE TELL ME WILL THE TYPHOON BE FITTED WITH A GUN AS THE TABLOIDS ARE SAYING IT WILL NOT?</description></item><item><title>Det er noget lort </title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1310.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:1310</guid><dc:creator>anonymous2</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1310.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=1310</wfw:commentRss><description> *** Posted by Thorbj&amp;#248;rn  *** &lt;br /&gt;Jeg syns det er noget lort for jeg er lige i gang med en m&amp;#229;ndens opg. og skal have et billed af en 20-mm maskinkanon.  </description></item><item><title>armament load of aircraft</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1625.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 19:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:1625</guid><dc:creator>anonymous2</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1625.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=1625</wfw:commentRss><description> *** Posted by Friedrich Kappes *** &lt;br /&gt;Hi, I look for the following information, can you help?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Eurocopter AS 532, 365 and 565: please have a look at http://picpage7.tripod.com/eurocopter.html &lt;br /&gt;Mil Mi-17KF: entry into service, armament&lt;br /&gt;Mil Mi-17MD: entry into service, armament&lt;br /&gt;Mil Mi-17TB Hip-H: entry into service, armament&lt;br /&gt;Tupolev Tu-142MZ Bear-F Mod. IV: armament&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you in advance!!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.geocities.com/friedkappes/flagship.html&lt;br /&gt;The FriedrichFiles&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Whats the gun to have </title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1566.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:1566</guid><dc:creator>anonymous2</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1566.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=1566</wfw:commentRss><description> *** Posted by Raymond-Paul *** &lt;br /&gt;The gun to have is a Glock 9mm or a Colt 45ACP.  Never leave home wilthout it.   Sad that someone did not have one &lt;br /&gt;at their disposal when some despots&lt;br /&gt;took over the aircraft on 9/11.&lt;br /&gt;Had someone had at least one gun, then&lt;br /&gt;box cutters are no match for a gun fight.   And the gun owner does not have to be a sky marshal.  Pilots ought to be armed at all times and some of the other crew members if they wish with passengers to back up with their own.&lt;br /&gt; </description></item><item><title>Whats the gun to have </title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1565.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2001 13:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:1565</guid><dc:creator>anonymous2</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1565.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=16&amp;PostID=1565</wfw:commentRss><description> *** Posted by Dusty *** &lt;br /&gt;All fighters should carry a gun whether it be for air or ground use but what size should be carried and what type the two i have seen most in use is the M61 vulcan rotary cannon 20mm and the mauser 27mm cannon . so whats your veiws whats the best, worse and the most powerfull (A-10 30mm .) </description></item></channel></rss>