<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.jets.dk/cs/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General Aviation</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/15/ShowForum.aspx</link><description>Questions about General Aviation</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60526.2668)</generator><item><title>Boeing proposes B717-300X</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/2368.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2003 12:06:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:2368</guid><dc:creator>lucasiu</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/2368.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=15&amp;PostID=2368</wfw:commentRss><description>http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2003/photorelease/q3/pr_030918g.html&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boeing is proposing the new B717-300X, which would be138.3 ft. (42.2 m) long, compared to 124 ft. (37.8 m) for the -200, and would carry 130 passengers in two-class configuraiton. The -300X would have higher maximum take-off and space limited payload weights, and greater engine thrust than the -200. The -300X also would have a service door behind the wing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If launched, delivery of the 717-300X is targeted for the second half of 2006.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is believed that such decision is urged by Air Tran, which operates mainly B717-200 and wanted larger derivatives of B717 of longer range, to serve routes with more passengers, as well as longer routes.</description></item></channel></rss>