<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.jets.dk/cs/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General Aviation</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/15/ShowForum.aspx</link><description>Questions about General Aviation</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60526.2668)</generator><item><title>The largest aircraft industry jokes</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/2084.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:52:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:2084</guid><dc:creator>lucasiu</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/2084.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=15&amp;PostID=2084</wfw:commentRss><description>The largest joke in aircarft industry ever is USSR's decision to rush Tu-144 supersonic jet without very good engineering, thus making these aircarfts have very short life of only 10 years in service, and cannot even sustain 1 return flight per week of only 2000 miles (3200km) per trip (that is, only 4 flight hours per week, totalling only 2100 flight hours in 10 years, which other aircrafts would reach such level for only half year!)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boeing's decision to produce 777-200LR (16000km range, 305 seats) &amp;amp; 777-300ER (13000km range, 368 seats) instead of smaller quads like A340 is the 2nd lareast joke in aircraft industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Antoher large joke is Lockheed's decision to produce L-1011 trijet of just 4500km range &amp;amp; hence very poor economy instead of longer range like DC-10 and short range twinjet like A300.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Pratt Whitney's decision to make PW6000 engines solely for A318 instead of producing smaller thrust variants of V2500 for A318 is also a very large joke, as this breaks the commonality among the A320 family members.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And Rolls Royce's decision to provide engine option only on B767-300, but not other variants of B767, not even B767-300ER, is also a large joke. This makes China Yunnan Airlines the only airline to specify B767-300 with Rolls Royce RB211-524 engine because of lack of commonality with other variants of B767.</description></item></channel></rss>