<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.jets.dk/cs/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>General Aviation</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/15/ShowForum.aspx</link><description>Questions about General Aviation</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.0 (Build: 60526.2668)</generator><item><title>A318 &amp;amp; PW6000 engines</title><link>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1806.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2002 02:28:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">a23efcf1-9e75-4ff9-be18-cd9cb68b9485:1806</guid><dc:creator>lucasiu</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/thread/1806.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.jets.dk/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=15&amp;PostID=1806</wfw:commentRss><description>Airbus A318 has 2 engine options, CFM56 &amp;amp; PW6000 dedicated for A318.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I think the decision made by Pratt Whitney of making PW6000 just for A318 &amp;amp; not for other aircrafts like B717 is not wise at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First of all, there would be very few PW6000 produced since A318 is the only aircraft to use PW6000 engine. This in turn rises production costs &amp;amp; prices.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Secondly, this greatly increases cost of maintenance because PW6000 uses the parts very different to V2500, which is a JV company between Pratt Whitney, Rolls Royce, MTU of Germany &amp;amp; Japanese Aero Engines Corporation (JAEC). This in turns makes the engine even less attractive.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So it is much better to design a lower power version of V2500 to power A318, like that of CFM56, rather than making a totally new engine for it.</description></item></channel></rss>