Forum
Welcome to Aviation Forum Sign in | Join | Help
Search  

Re:Archer vs AIM

  •  05-06-1999, 2:37 AM

    Re:Archer vs AIM

    *** Posted by TIGER ***
    Hi Rapier
    About AIM9.
    The most advanced AIM9 is 5 years behind the Archer.
    I know it is hard to believe but russians have more advanced dogfighting missiles. That's the true.
    TIGER

    [Hi Tiger,

    I dont know? Looking at what you said you would have to say that the MIG-29 is slightly better. But why have F-16's in "Operation Allied Force" been so sucessfull in downing these MIG's. I think the F-16 (and NATO planes) have some type of secret/sophisticated radar system that only the pilots know how to use. Other than the AWACS telling the pilots where the bandits are I dont see what else the AWACS can do apart from vector the F-16's towards the enemy. It is strange dont you think? I dont like to take anything away from the pilots by the way I think they are doing a great job.

    Is the ARCHER better because it is a younger missle then the AIM, (I dont know how long ARCHERS have been around) dont forget there are a few different types of AIM missle, but the AIM is old and has been improved throughout it's lifetime.

    I am sorry for my knowledge on Russian aircraft, so forgive me, like I say you probably know more about Russian aircraft than I do.

    What do you think Tiger? Is the MIG or F-16 better?

    Regards

    Rapier]
View Complete Thread